Showing posts with label online banking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label online banking. Show all posts

Thursday, May 22, 2008

ID Theft Hits Home

A new breed of ID-thief wants to heist your home (literally), because they know it's likely your most valuable asset. Here's how to keep the swindlers from wrecking your home ownership.

by Broderick Perkins
© 2008 DeadlineNews.Com

More ID theft news that really hits home.

Deadline Newsroom - A growing number of crooks who steal your identity don't swipe your personal information to pilfer from your financial accounts.

They want to get their hands on your home and snatch it right out from under you.

Modern day malefactors are mindful of the fact that while you may have quite a stash to swipe from your savings, credit and investment accounts, chances are your home is your most valuable asset.

You can, however, protect your home from a heist by taking measured preventative steps.

The Federal Bureau of Investigations recently reported the new scourge of "house stealing", a marriage between mortgage fraud and identity theft (ID theft), both of which are now staples of organized criminal activity.

Here's the basic house stealing scam:

• A grifter chooses a house and assumes the identity of the homeowner, often using the Internet to obtain personal information. The information is used to create fake identification papers.

• The culprit then transfers the deed into his or her name using forged documents, signatures and fake identification, but by filing the paperwork with the proper authorities. Now they "own" the home.

• In one variation, the house thief steals the home and then sells it to pocket the profits -- even if someone still lives there. In another variation, crooks prey on homeowners in financial trouble. They promise to refinance the mortgage, but instead "buy" the home using fake identities.

Sai Huda, CEO of San Diego, CA-based Compliance Coach recently deployed CompliancePal the first-of-its kind software clients use to meet federal requirements to weed out ID theft "red flags" -- indicators that identity filching could be afoot.

Huda said the software has found other variations on the house stealing scheme including a team posing as both the owner selling the property and the buyer making the purchase. The real homeowner is left in the lurch.

He developed the software to help federally regulated institutions comply with the so-called "Red Flag" provision of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACTA). Fully effective in November this year, the provision requires that financial institutions, creditors and others who handle your personal identifying documents develop and deploy an ID theft prevention program.

The federal provision comes with more than two dozen red flags regulated companies must heed.

"If businesses fail to comply it's not only civil monetary penalties, it's also violations of federal and state unfair and deceptive acts laws. It's a serious risk for Realtors, mortgage brokers, lenders and others who don't comply," Huda said.

But Huda's software has found nearly as many additional red flags beyond the federal regulations and he says that indicates consumers also have their work cut out for them.

"Consumers need to ask, 'Who am I doing business with? What are they doing to protect me? What am I doing to protect myself?' " he added.

To prevent someone from stealing your home, take conventional ID-theft prevention measures with a focus on protecting your home's ownership.

• Review your credit report frequently. You can do so three times a year for free at the one and only federally-sanctioned AnnualCreditReport.com by getting one report, in turn, every four months from each of the three major credit reporting agencies -- Equifax, Experian and Transunion. Avoid sound-alike services.

• "Just as you keep tabs on your credit report, keep a watch once or twice a year on your home's title records," says Huda. You don't need to hire a title company for a title search, but it's a smart move to visit your county recorder or other public recording agency to check your title for lien changes or additions, requests for information or other anomalies.

• Question all real estate professionals who work on your home transaction about their experience, how they handle your private information and check their license or certification status for complaints or other issues.

• Invest in a confetti shredder to destroy identifying documents before tossing them. Better yet, rub out the paper trail and move financial transactions online. Conduct as much digital banking as possible. The online account gives you 24 hour access to inspect your accounts as often as you wish.

• When you are away, put a stop on all mail and deliveries rather than have someone pick them up.

• Use a safe or safety deposit box for any important documents paperwork you must retain.

© 2008 DeadlineNews.Com

Advertise on DeadlineNews.Com

Get news that really hits home for your Web site or blog from DeadlineNews.Com.

Broderick Perkins, an award-winning consumer journalist of 30 years, is publisher and executive editor of San Jose, CA-based DeadlineNews.Com, a real estate news and consulting service, and the new Deadline Newsroom, DeadlineNews.Com's new backshop. In both cases, it's where all the news really hits home.


DeadlineNews.Com's Editorial Content Is Intellectual Property • Unauthorized Use Is A Federal Crime


Read more!

Friday, November 16, 2007

Online 'Privacy Policies' Vastly Misunderstood

by Broderick Perkins
© 2007 DeadlineNews.Com

Deadline Newsroom – Follow up the federal Do Not Call registry with a Do Not Track list for those who shop online from home and elsewhere.

That's the appeal from consumer agencies to the Federal Trade Commission after a compilation of several academic studies revealed online "privacy policies" at ecommerce sites are not what users think they are -- often because they don't take the time to read them.

With no Do Not Track service in place as the holiday shopping frenzy ensues in households from coast-to-coast, reading privacy policies is consumers' best bet to learn what happens to their information when they shop online.

As many as 63 percent of Americans incorrectly believe the phrase "privacy policy" on online shopping sites signifies that their information will be kept private, according to "Consumers Fundamentally Misunderstand The Online Advertising Marketplace".

Also, 37 percent of online shoppers falsely believe that a privacy policy prohibits a website from using information to analyze individuals' activities online.

Wrong again.

In fact, "privacy policies" typically explain common ecommerce practices, those perfectly legal information-collection techniques that are the foundation of online advertising business models, according to the report of surveys co-compiled by the University of Pennsylvania Annenberg School for Communication and University of California-Berkeley Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic.

"They assume the website cannot engage in many practices that, in reality, are common in ecommerce. Consumers do not understand the nature and legality of information-collection techniques that form the core of online advertising business models," according to the report.

The report's authors say because incorrect consumer beliefs about privacy policies are so widespread and disconnected, the Feds should step in to better police the term "privacy policy" to make it truer to its perception.

Consumers also believe privacy policies prohibit "enhancement" -- the common practice of collecting data and combining it with information from other sources.

In one survey when consumers were asked "If a website has a privacy policy, it means that the site cannot buy information about you from other sources to analyze your online activities," 39.8 percent answered (incorrectly) true, and 10.8 percent didn't know.

However, when information-gathering techniques -- the process of tracking, extracting and sharing information to make money from advertising -- were explained to consumers, 85 percent overwhelmingly rejected the privacy they give up in exchange for access to content.

When offered a choice to get content from a valued site with such a policy or pay for the site and not have it collect information, 54 percent of adults who go online at home said that they would rather use legwork and search for information offline than exercise either option presented.

The report concludes: "As the Federal Trade Commission revisits privacy issues implicated by behavioral profiling and online advertising, its approach must be informed by the fact that consumers understandably assume that 'privacy policies' create substantive rules limiting collection and use of data. The Commission should police the term 'privacy policy' so that websites and network advertisers have protections in place consistent with reasonable consumer expectations."

Consumers are also responsible for taking steps to keep private information as close to the vest as possible.

• Privacy Rights Clearing House offers insights on the privacy policy issue in "Online Shopping Tips: E-Commerce and You."
• The Federal Trade Commission also offers a guide "Online Shopping & E-Payments."

• Preventing ID Thieves From Stealing Innocence
• Final 'Red Flag' Rules Set To Wave Off ID Theft
• New ID Theft Study Points to Strangers
• Credit Freeze Doesn't Guarantee ID Theft Protection

© 2007 DeadlineNews.Com

Broderick Perkins, an award-winning consumer journalist of 30 years, is publisher and executive editor of San Jose, CA-based DeadlineNews.Com, a real estate news and consulting service, and the new Deadline Newsroom, DeadlineNews.Com's new backshop. In both cases, it's where all the news really hits home.



DeadlineNews.Com's Editorial Content Is Intellectual Property • Unauthorized Use Is A Federal Crime


Read more!

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Mortgage Mistakes Tank NetBank

by Broderick Perkins
© 2007 DeadlineNews.Com

Deadline Newsroom – Alpharetta, GA-based NetBank Inc., the first online bank to tank, in part, because of mortgage market missteps, is also the first federally-insured thrift to go under in the current market because of mortgage issues.

NetBank is also the largest federally-insured bank to go under since the Savings and Loan Crisis cost the nation as much as $500 billion beginning decades ago.

The event raises red flags for consumers of the now-bankrupt institution, many of them mortgage holders. That's because former NetBank customers are likely to be bombarded with misleading spam and phishing -- fraudulent emailed attempts to gain sensitive, private information by masquerading as a legitimate company.

The bank's failure is also a lesson for consumers who plop down more than $100,000 in even a federally-insured bank. Recovering all amounts over $100,000 could be arduous. For that reason, financial planners and advisers frown upon depositing more than the $100,000 insured level in any single bank.

As for the phishing likely to follow, NetBank customers aren't the only ones who could be threatened with identity theft. Phishing operations don't discriminate.

Federal regulators and banks that acquired NetBank assets say they will not email former NetBank customers asking them to validate deposits or otherwise request personal, confidential information, such as account numbers, Social Security Number, driver's license number, and the like.

Regulators and banking officials advise all consumers not respond to such email and to consider it fraudulent. Forward such email, with the full header attached to, spam@uce.gov.

• The FDIC has a toll-free number for customers affected by the failure: 1-888-256-6932.

• Also online locations where customers can get the straight scoop are ING Bank and the FDIC.

© 2007 DeadlineNews.Com

Broderick Perkins, an award-winning consumer journalist of 30 years, is publisher and executive editor of San Jose, CA-based DeadlineNews.Com, a real estate news and consulting service, and the new Deadline Newsroom, DeadlineNews.Com's new backshop. In both cases, it's where all the news really hits home.



DeadlineNews.Com's Editorial Content Is Intellectual Property - Unauthorized Use Is A Federal Crime


Read more!